• 0

Zeus High Risk Investments

You may recall that TFO Tax was previously engaged by Zeus Partners to act on their behalf in respect of HM Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC) civil enquiries into investors’ claims for income tax relief.

We acknowledge that it has been some considerable time since our last update. However, given that HMRC chose to escalate their enquiries to a criminal investigation in July 2011 thereby bringing the civil enquiry to a halt, together with the sensitivities surrounding the criminal investigation, we took the decision not to comment further. We trust you appreciate the stance taken.


Read More …..

  • 0

TFO Tax (Let Property Campaign)

HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) believes that taxpayers want to pay the correct amount of tax and therefore it wants to help those that may not have been doing so. HMRC’s Let Property Campaign is an opportunity for landlords who let out residential property, either in the UK or overseas, to bring their tax affairs up to date and take advantage of the favourable terms being offered


View entire story here

  • 0

IMPORTANT – Changes to UK Taxation for Non-UK Domiciles

Whether your clients are resident in the UK for tax purposes or not the following changes for non-UK domiciled individuals need to be considered.

The proposed changes, announced in the 2016 Autumn Statement, will become effective from 6 April 2017 although until such time as the Finance Bill 2017 receives Royal Ascent changes may still be made.


View entire story here

  • 0

2016 Autumn Statement

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Anthony Hammond MP, gave his Autumn Statement on Wednesday 23 November 2016.

View Here.

  • 0

Supreme Court Refuses Eclipse 35 Appeal

The Supreme Court has refused Future Capital Partners’ (“FCP”) appeal to have the decision reached by the Court of Appeal considered by the highest tax tribunal in the land.

Last February the Court of Appeal dismissed FCP’s appeal against an earlier ruling in favour of HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”).

The Court of Appeal found Eclipse 35 (“E35”) was never likely to generate ‘contingent receipts’ and as a result held that E35 was “not commercially trading with a view to make any profit”.

The Court of Appeal therefore found that E35 was not a trading business within the meaning of the tax legislation.

The Supreme Court, after hearing an hour of legal argument from FCP’s representative, Jolyan Maughan QC, concluded that there were no new legal grounds to persuade them that the Court of Appeal had reached the wrong decision.

The Supreme Court ruling marks the end of a three year pursuit of E35 by HMRC and the Courts.

What next?

It is expected that HMRC will now turn its attention to the other Eclipse Film Partnerships formed and administered by FCP. Whether this is by Follower Notice or further litigation is yet to be determined.

It is understood that there are material differences between E35 and the other Eclipse Film Partnerships in relation to the expectation to receive contingent receipts referred to in E35. This may result in a different outcome however TFO Tax believes this is likely to be an uphill struggle.

The decision is expected to have an impact on a number of other investment arrangements offer tax advantages as well as other business ventures where HMRC may seek to deny losses or other deductions on the grounds that they would, or may never, make a profit.

Watch the hearing at

  • 0

Budget 2016


A summary of George Osborne’s March 2016 Budget.

View Here.